Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bars form charity; patrons light up
Toledo Blade ^ | Tuesday, January 20, 2004 | Tom Troy

Posted on 01/25/2004 8:33:43 AM PST by lockjaw02

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:25:31 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Several Toledo tavern owners have created a private club that they say will allow their premises to be exempt from the city

(Excerpt) Read more at toledoblade.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: pufflist; smokingbans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Further developments on Toledo's actions to fight the Taverns for Tots initiative can be found in the subsequent article, Taverns for Tots faces city application process.
1 posted on 01/25/2004 8:33:44 AM PST by lockjaw02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *puff_list; bc2; The Mayor; qam1; VermiciousKnid; Madame Dufarge; SheLion; Gabz; Conspiracy Guy; ...
(ping)
2 posted on 01/25/2004 8:35:03 AM PST by lockjaw02 ("Man's capacity for self-deception is unlimited." --George H Tausch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lockjaw02
"Two inspectors, accompanied by three police officers, visited Delaney’s Lounge on Tuesday and Thursday last week to check for illegal smokers."

Two wearing Brown Shirts and the other three wearing Jack Boots and long, black leather coats.

Turns my stomach and wrenches my soul to see this happening in America.

3 posted on 01/25/2004 9:07:21 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lockjaw02
But customer Greg Garreau said he was disappointed at the development. A nonsmoker, Mr. Garreau said he thinks the smoking ban should be complied with strictly, as it was for a while after the smoking ban took effect on Aug. 24. He said he doesn’t complain, but he has asked people not to smoke next to him when he has been in bars that allow smoking.

What a steaming pile!


4 posted on 01/25/2004 9:15:13 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
Three police officers to check on smoking? I would call that overkill or are the Toledo cops just looking for something to do.

If I were going to commit a robbery I would call the police and make several reports of smoking and then,when the police are off checking the puffing criminals I'd go commit my robbery.

What a waste of manpower.
5 posted on 01/25/2004 9:23:11 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lockjaw02; bc2
Thanks for the Ping, here is the latest on the smoking ban in Buffalo..

ERIE COUNTY Criteria set for waiver of state smoking ban

After months of criticism, Erie County slightly loosened a strict smoking ban by releasing long-awaited rules Friday for obtaining exemptions.

Some anti-smoking advocates praised the guidelines. Others continued to call for a total ban on smoking in public places.

Meanwhile, some businesses expressed optimism about the new waiver process, while others described the guidelines as a disappointment.

"The county criteria are more stringent than the state's. They are more stringent than those in Niagara County," said Nicholas P. Amigone III, attorney for Jimmy Mac's, an Elmwood Avenue bar-restaurant that took legal action on the waiver issue.

"It will be difficult for us or anyone else to qualify," he said. "We have lost our ability to make a profit."

Businesses and social clubs have fiercely lobbied for exemptions since the State Legislature enacted the smoking law in July, saying the ban jeopardized their livelihoods by driving away customers.

The waiver application process released by the county's top public health official requires proof from businesses and social clubs that the ban has caused undue financial hardship, including documentation of at least a 15 percent decline in sales tax receipts caused solely by the smoking ban.

Even if a waiver is granted, smokers can light up only in clearly marked rooms that are ventilated and equipped with self-closing doors.

"We've tried in our approach to protect the public's health while carrying out the spirit of the law," said Dr. Anthony Billittier IV, county health commissioner.

About 150 establishments - from bars to bowling alleys to social organizations - have expressed an interest in a waiver in Erie County, according to Health Department officials. It's not clear how many more will apply. A waiver application costs $98 and must be resubmitted annually.

The state law provided for exemptions but gave little guidance about how to decide who should get them if counties choose to allow them.

Counties with health departments could establish their own criteria for waivers, the state said. But, as in Erie County, most waited for the state to set standards.

Things changed in December after a lawsuit was filed by Jimmy Mac's and later joined by the Gaelic American Athletic Association's Irish Center on Abbott Road.

The establishments argued in court that the county ignored the state law for five months and had no right to reject their requests for exemptions when the law includes an exemption provision.

An "impossible' task

As a result, State Supreme Court Justice Rose H. Sconiers ordered Billittier to devise criteria for waivers by Friday.

Shortly after her order, the state issued rules that applied to the 21 counties that don't have their own health departments but that other counties might use as a guide.

The state rules allow two-year waivers of the smoking ban for "undue financial hardship," defined as a reduction in food and beverage sales of at least 15 percent. Waivers also can be issued for safety or security reasons that make compliance unreasonable, for "exceptional circumstances" and in cases where establishments spent significantly to accommodate smokers for smoking restrictions that existed before the state ban.

While outlining his policy, Billittier leveled criticism at the State Legislature for enacting the law with a provision for waivers that lacked details about how counties should handle them.

"This ban was dumped on health departments with little guidance," he said. "We were asked to do the impossible, to decide on a level of financial hardship that was worth compromising the health of employees and customers in a business."

Court action is expected

He and others want the Legislature to modify the bill either by declaring definitively that waivers are not allowed or by setting more detailed guidelines that can be applied equally across the state.

"Our policy is going to be the subject of criticism and court action," he said.

Erie County's waiver decision follows a similar release of guidelines in Niagara County that are not as stringent. Those rules, for instance, set the bar for undue financial hardship at a 10 percent decline in sales tax receipts.

Billittier's guidelines received praise from some anti-smoking advocates.

"(The criteria) cut through the rhetoric of financial doom and gloom and put the onus on business to protect employees, patrons and vendors," said Gretchen Leffler, regional vice president of the American Cancer Society.

Others were critical.

"We don't support weakening the law. The health protections are too important," said Terry Alford, a representative of the Erie-Niagara Tobacco-Free Coalition.

"The simplest and fairest rule is to not grant waivers, as is the case for the majority of the population in New York. If waivers are to be granted, then they need to prove losses are because of the law," said Andrew Hyland, a Roswell Park Cancer Institute researcher who studies tobacco issues.

Bar owners greeted the changes with cautious optimism, although few were familiar yet with details of the guidelines. Now, at least, a process exists to review waiver applications.

"It's a foot in the door. The counties are at least listening to the business owners," said Judi Justiana, owner of Judi's Lounge, a longtime pub in Niagara Falls with a cast of regulars who enjoyed a smoke with their drink.

"This is so important to small businesses," said Michael Campbell, owner of Buddies, a bar on South Elmwood Avenue. "Customers are just not coming out. My business is down at least 30 percent."

Amigone said, "We believe the criteria are arbitrary and capricious," noting that different counties will have different standards.

Use of sales tax criticized

Like other critics, he pointed out that the county guidelines fail to take into consideration business owners who spent handsomely on ventilation systems or smoking rooms in recent years.

He also argued that sales tax receipts inadequately reflect how well a business is doing. A business could have fewer customers, for instance, but not see a change in sales tax receipts if it raised prices.


e-mail: hdavis@buffnews.com

6 posted on 01/25/2004 9:25:02 AM PST by The Mayor (Be steadfast, immovable, . . . knowing that your labor is not in vain in the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mears
"What a waste of manpower."

Yup.

'Hello, 9-1-1?'
'This is 9-1-1. Do you have an emergency?'
'Yes! A burglar is inside my house and he is threatening to rape and kill me. Please hurry!'
'We'll be there as soon as possible, but we're a little short of manpower right now. Thirty minutes, minimum.'
'But he just lit up a cigarette!
'The squad car just pulled into your driveway. Unlock the front door and stand aside.'

7 posted on 01/25/2004 9:48:25 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: GreatEconomy
I agree. It's encouraging to know that there are non-smokers out there who realize this is not about smoking or non-smoking. It's a periodic move by governments to test the people's resistance to tyranny and fascism.
9 posted on 01/25/2004 9:59:48 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor
"(The criteria) cut through the rhetoric of financial doom and gloom and put the onus on business to protect employees, patrons and vendors," said Gretchen Leffler, regional vice president of the American Cancer Society

I have a proposal.

Let's lobby for a 15% cut in Gretchen Leffler's pay, the same sacrifice she expects business owners to make.

The money then can more productively be spent on cancer research.

You know, for a higher and better use, other than Gretchen's Volvo payments.

10 posted on 01/25/2004 10:19:23 AM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
Why only 15%. Many barowners and employees are living with bigger reductions than that. How about doing away with her worthless position altogether! ;)
11 posted on 01/25/2004 10:38:36 AM PST by lockjaw02 ("Man's capacity for self-deception is unlimited." --George H Tausch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
I agree, it would be a good way to prove her commitment..
12 posted on 01/25/2004 10:39:08 AM PST by The Mayor (Be steadfast, immovable, . . . knowing that your labor is not in vain in the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor
Thanks for the update.
13 posted on 01/25/2004 10:40:03 AM PST by lockjaw02 ("Man's capacity for self-deception is unlimited." --George H Tausch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lockjaw02
Why only 15%. Many barowners and employees are living with bigger reductions than that.

You're right, a 100% reduction in her pay would be better.

14 posted on 01/25/2004 10:47:27 AM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Say, has "Gin Mills for Jesus" ever been tried on Olde Cape Cod?

Just a suggestion.

15 posted on 01/25/2004 11:02:45 AM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lockjaw02
There is always some creative minds out there, you gotta love it.

Hope it works.

16 posted on 01/25/2004 11:28:41 AM PST by Great Dane (You can smoke just about everywhere in Denmark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
I laughed out loud at your 911 scenario----thanks!
17 posted on 01/25/2004 12:03:17 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mears
You're welcome! Hey, they can steal my Lucky Strikes but they can't touch my sense of humor. Some here will remember a similar saying during WWII: 'Sex is one thing the bahstids can't ration.' ;->

How times have changed. The government bent over backwards to insure those in the military had an opportunity to smoke. Even supplied us with cheap smokes, even if they were a little stained and tasted a little like sea water.

Personally, I preferred the smell of cigarette smoke to gun smoke. Perhaps today's thugs should take note of that.

18 posted on 01/25/2004 1:07:14 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lockjaw02
But customer Greg Garreau said he was disappointed at the development. A nonsmoker, Mr. Garreau said he thinks the smoking ban should be complied with strictly, as it was for a while after the smoking ban took effect on Aug. 24. He said he doesn’t complain, but he has asked people not to smoke next to him when he has been in bars that allow smoking.

OR, he could go to nonsmoking bars. For some reason, he feels the need to go here and tell other people what to do!

19 posted on 01/25/2004 1:10:48 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor; 2right; not-alone; 7SonOfRN; AMVET_66; ANC Vet; BillJonesofNY; birdsman; Bob Eimiller; ..
Upstate New York Ping

Smoker or non-smoker, I hope everyone sees this as the disgusting abuse of private property, limited government and free will that it is!

Please let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from this ping list.

Thanks!

20 posted on 01/25/2004 2:16:10 PM PST by bc2 (http://thinkforyourself.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson